Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

FO: 18th C. Fashion baby

  • Sep. 29th, 2004 at 6:29 PM
dress diary
My Janet Arnold pattern-book-sized doll, I'd guess about 8" or 9". She's wearing a miniature of the same cut of sack back gown as my Flora MacDonald red plaid gown, and the striped cloth I used for her dress is from a vintage child-sized sleeve that sat in someone's quilt stash for god knows how long. I think I'm justifiably proud of her.


More pictures here.

She's actually a re-make, thought I didn't do much to her body or clothes. What I did re-make were her head and hands.

The original was fairly stark and awful, one of my first attempts as an adult at doll making, over 10 years ago. The head was a hard plaster cast of a sculpted polyclay head that had not stood up well in baking, and had been painted starkly in black, white and red, with REALLY BIG EYES. Then I glazed it with nailpolish, which had yellowed badly. Her old wig was also awful, nicely styled but human hair (WAY out of scale, like me using phone cable to make a wig for me- really coarse and stiff), and stark black. :P Her hands and feet were unpainted white polyclay, and nicely sculpted, but glazed with nailpolish and also badly yellowed.

I took her clothes off, steamed them, mended them, and set them aside. I pried off her old wig and wiped her down with acetone until she was clean, and sewed the loose leg back onto the body. Then I set about re-sculpting her face over the old thin, stark, stained plaster base. I mixed up some colored, thinnable putty with lightweight spackle, latex caulk (low-budget acrylic medium - i have no money and this was on hand), white acrylic for opacity and a drop or two of terracotta colored miniature paint from Chris's stash. The idea behind stianing the plaster was to give her skin more depth than just flat painting would.

It took a couple of days to do, since I had to layer it on in places to do advanced things like giving her her ears (there were none on the original sculpt), making hollows in the eyesockets (to paint in the pupils for depth before filling them with clear glaze), re-scuplting teh lips and nose so they looked real, and building up real 18thc. ideal plump cheeks. I overpainted her face very lightly, just basically giving it light washes of color to make it more lively, and painting in the lips. The eyes were especially fun as I finished the whole face including glazing the eyes and then built up the eyelids and gave them their shading. Only the lower lip and the eyes have any shine to them.

I painted the arms and upper thighs to match her face and neck, and had to re-sculpt the left hand to hold a book as the thumb had been lost and my putty mixture was too soft to build a durable thumb without a support.

Then I re-dressed her and re-wigged her with some ramie fiber I have lying around. It does a farily nice job of pretending to be blond har, plus it curls really well with water wehn wrapped around a needle. I still need to make her some little shoes, but I think she's done enough to show off.

Comments

[info]linuxwitch wrote:
Sep. 29th, 2004 04:36 pm (UTC)
piccies no workie, says the acct is private :)
[info]jauncourt wrote:
Sep. 29th, 2004 04:40 pm (UTC)
Should be fixed now :)
I don't know why it got set to private, since I had a pic up there before that was public :P

Well, it was easy enough to fix.
[info]rvqavalon wrote:
Sep. 29th, 2004 09:45 pm (UTC)
Hi! Just clicked by via [info]jenthompson's journal. Your doll is absolutely beautiful! I've always loved miniatures, and this nearly knocked me out of my chair. Very, very impressive. :)
[info]jauncourt wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2004 12:10 am (UTC)
*blush* thanks :)

I read over in your journal that you are getting into 18thc reenactments. I used to do that, and I have many resources at my disposal. Please LMK if I can be of help in your research :)
[info]rvqavalon wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2004 06:39 pm (UTC)
Ooh, that's wonderful of you! I can't think of any specific questions right now, but I'm sure you'll probably hear from me later, if that's all right with you. :D I just went to your site--the baby is absolutely a doll! :)
[info]guyelfkin wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2004 02:33 am (UTC)
Ooooooooooh!

Teddy
[info]jauncourt wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2004 02:38 am (UTC)
That's how I feel too. I'm just amazed I did so well, everytime I look at her ;)

The pictures really don't do her justice. I wish my digicam was better :\
[info]guyelfkin wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2004 02:45 am (UTC)
Well, it would be nice to see clearer details, but {shrug} our digicam's no better and I hardly ever get around to putting my stuff up on the web (and after you desigfned that lovely webpage for me and everything - shameful!) so you're *way* ahead of me there - and it's nice that you share.

Teddy
[info]fieryredhead wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2004 07:03 am (UTC)
Wow.
That doll looks great! Must see it in person!
[info]marquesate wrote:
Sep. 30th, 2004 07:20 am (UTC)
Re: Wow.
This is beautiful! I don't usually like dolls, but this one is just like the fashion dolls that were sent around in the 17th & 18th centuries. Gorgeous!